Contact Us
Who We AreWhat We DoOur ClientsNews & EventsCenter of Excellence

Consultant's Corner : May 2008

Previous Next
0

I admit it, I'm a tree hugger. I love to be outside and hike and bike and enjoy all that nature has to offer. I like to take my family, get out of the city, and seek out the "green" spaces. Given this passion in my life, I've also gotten keenly aware of the global climate crisis that is creeping up upon us. I've started to research alternative energy sources such as solar and wind and now follow them as they mature and begin to make a dent in the foot hold that coal and oil have on this country.

 

A good friend of mine sent me an article from the Seattle Times talking about wind energy and the growing talent crisis the industry is starting to face. In his article, "Wind Energy Hasn't Blown in Enough Workers," David Twiddy describes the talent challenges occurring in wind energy.

"Wind-power officials see a much larger obstacle coming in the form of its own work force, a highly specialized group of technicians that combines working knowledge of mechanics, hydraulics, computers and meteorology with the willingness to climb 200 feet in the air in all kinds of weather. That work force isn't keeping up with the future demand, partly because the industry is so new that the oldest independent training programs are less than five years old. The American Wind Energy Association, a Washington, D.C.-based trade group, estimates the industry employs about 20,000 people, not including those making turbines or other equipment. Future need is harder to quantify, given the uncertainties of the industry's growth. But with two-man teams generally responsible for seven to 10 turbines, the industry would need up to 800 technicians to serve the turbines expected to be installed this year alone."

This article emphases the point that the talent crisis goes beyond the retirement of the "boomers" and also extends into new technologies and the workforce needed to make them flourish. Employers today must understand that the talent pipeline can and should extend far beyond the recruiting portal or job boards. No longer is it simply enough to sit back and wait for workers to come to you. Employers must start to reach out much earlier in the process and work with colleges, trade schools, and other training organizations to influence the talent pool coming into the industry. Partnering with these organizations can have a profound effect on the quality and volume of candidates to choose from.

 

Link to article: Wind Energy Hasn't Blown in Enough Workers

0 Comments Permalink
1

Butts-In-Seats Matter

Posted by Mike Brennan May 29, 2008

In speaking with a lot of learning and development professionals lately, I hear that a lot of them are not concerned with 'butts-in-seats' for classroom training or 'eyeballs' or completions for online courses. Rather they are concerned with more strategic measures such as knowledge transfer and ROI. Some of them have even relegated attendance to a lowly Level 0 on Kirkpatrick's famous 4-level impact scale, which starts at level 1, stating that such reports are useless.

 

I think this view is a little extreme. In fact, I think that while 'butts-in-seats' as a measure is transactional, it is foundational in that it can lend strategic insights into the value of learning investments and lead to better decisions on how to allocate those investments going forward. For instance:

 

 

  • It matters to a Chief Compliance Officer that every manager took part in the sexual harassment training. Without any needed proof of knowledge transfer or understanding in any state of which I am aware (sad), attendance is all you really have.

  • Several senior business leaders with whom I've spoken want to know that their potential successors are taking part in the accelerated leadership development programs they were involved in designing for the good of the long-term health of the company.

  • The head of product marketing wants to know that all salespeople and channel partners have sat through training on the new black-box, which is now available for sale 4 weeks ahead of the company's nearest competitors' black-box.

  • The head of customer training is concerned about butts-in-seats because its directly tied to the top line of her P&L. She is also interested in the average price charged per learner.

  • The CLO cares because he wants to know what courses are in high-demand and which ones should be put out to pasture.

 

While I don't subscribe to obsessing over transactional measures like attendance or training departmental measures such as how much you spend on catering, I do feel that you do need spend some time tracking them in order to tie training to business value via quality and efficiency. I'd love to hear how you're approaching your T&D measurement strategy.

1 Comments Permalink
2

Wailing or Engaging?

Posted by Suzanne Rumsey May 10, 2008

How does your organization keep employees engaged during tough times? There's good evidence that organizations that can keep their employees engaged when the economy takes a dive are those that are most successful in the long run.

 

Keeping employees engaged is not the same as keeping them satisfied. Engagement drives performance - employees understand where the organization is going and how it is going to get there. They know how they fit into the organization's big picture, and what is expected of them. Unnecessary barriers that inhibit working effectively are removed. Employees are held accountable for their work, and experience the adulation of work well done, as well as the consequences when performance does not meet expectations. Feedback is timely and meaningful. Rewards are comensurate with performance and value contribution. These are the ways to engage employees. Enhanced employee engagement is a critical busienss outcome that drives organizational performance. At Knowledge Infusion, we work with organizations every day on better enabling these outcomes through people, process and technology.

 

What likely does not work at all, and may indeed backfire? Distributing motivational "stuff": posters, mugs, lunch bags, and other chatzkes. Have you heard of Despair, Inc.? Or "The Wailing List"? I bet your employees have. This is an organization that has made a statement parodying the motivational "stuff" industry. As you can imagine, their website becomes pretty popular in tough economic times. If you see Despair, Inc. "Demotivators" popping up around the office, that may be an indication that all is not well on the engagement front.

 

The good news about the drivers of employee engagement? Most of those things are behavioral - how leaders and managers do their jobs. And behavior changes don't cost a lot of dollars. Behavior changes do require concerted focus and effort, though. So here's my question: can organizations afford the costs of engagement during rough times? Or maybe the better question is: can organizations afford the costs of non-engagement? Would love to hear your thoughts...

2 Comments Permalink
0

Two experiences this past weekend emphasized for me - again - both the incredible advantages, and disadvantages, of today's technologies that enable us to be connected to one another 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. First, the experience that reminded me of the disadvantages. It's a fairly mundane story, actually. I took Friday off. That's it - I took the day off from work. Except that, even though I took the day off and was driving with my husband through to my high school reunion, I still "attended" a team meeting via cell phone. The reason I attended this meeting on my day off? I am pretty sure I attended it simply because I could, because I had the technology that enabled me to do so. So, why not? (Thank heavens I have wonderful colleagues who promptly reminded me of the need for work-life balance, and that when I say I am taking the day off, I really need to take the day OFF.) The lesson: just because technology allows us to do something, we don't have to do it.

 

Now, for the amazing experience that reminded me of the advantages. Saturday night was the big class dinner at the reunion, and during the meal I sat next to a terrific classmate sharing our current professional endeavors. This friend shared his newly acquired knowledge of my employment with Knowledge Infusion with another classmate and his spouse a little later. Turned out that this other classmate and spouse know several KI folks through professional affiliations. Further, the spouse already knew who I was, simply because we have so many connections in common on Facebook, and she had seen my name a lot, as I had seen hers. The funniest thing about this? As she and I were talking, I was getting emails from my KI colleagues asking if I knew or had met her, as they had seen on her Facebook status that she was headed to the same reunion I was heading to. So, here we all were: talking real time with each other, communicating virtually with various KI colleagues through email and mobile Facebook on our Blackberries. Technology enabled all of us to recognize and connect with each other, realizing the many different ways our paths cross in life. The lesson: sometimes, when technology enables these amazing opportunities to connect with terrific people, we should take advantage of them, and follow up with a face-to-face interaction when possible.

 

At Knowledge Infusion, we work with organizations to implement technologies that enable human interaction and collaboration. We also remind our clients that technology is nothing more than an enabler, that as humans, we still need to use our judgment about when using technology is wise (e.g., to facilitate making new friends), and perhaps not so wise (tipping work-life balance too far to the work side). It's helpful to remind ourselves of this every once in a while.

0 Comments Permalink