I, too, agree with the value of face-to-face. Technology (and associated cost "savings") marches on, though. Look for companies to follow the likes of IBM, Cisco, and Sun Microsystems to hold meetings and training NOT through Web-displayed PowerPoint and speaker phones, but through 3D Virtual worlds like SecondLife (http://secondlife.com).
Consider the cost of holding a face-to-face meeting with attendees from New York, St. Paul, Dallas, Portland (Maine AND Oregon!), Mexico City, Tokyo, Seoul, Hong Kong, New Delhi, Milan, Barcelona, London, and Copenhagen.
True, even 3D avatars don't have the same non-verbal expressions and skin-to-skin touch of a handshake. Then again, how else would we know that members fancy themselves as a Knight of the Round Table, a Polar Bear, a Disney-esque princess, or a cowboy!?
Neil,
As HR technology continues to move toward SaaS and on-demand, I do think the need for on-site implementation teams will be limited. This is mainly true for the rapid start implementations where the customer needs/wants to be up and running quickly and is comfortable with making minor configuration changes to the system. These are not your traditional, heavily customized implementations.
That said, I completely agree that there needs to be some level of face to face interaction during the implementation process. Especially during kick off and critical configuration sessions.
To ensure the success of a virtual implementation you must have clearly defined roles, responsibilities, expectations and communication plans in place.